Automatic Radio Mfg. Co. v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that A[b]ecause the interrogatories themselves are relevant, the fact that answers to them will be burdensome and expensive >is not in itself a reason for refusing to order discovery which is otherwise appropriate= @
• stating that A[b]ecause the interrogatories themselves are relevant, the fact that answers to them will be burdensome and expensive >is not in itself a reason for refusing to order discovery which is otherwise appropriate= @
• stating that “[b]Jecause the interrogatories themselves are relevant, the fact that answers to them will be burdensome and expensive ‘is not in itself a reason for refusing to order discovery which is otherwise appropriate’ ”
• stating that “[b]ecause the interrogatories themselves are relevant, the fact that answers to them will be burdensome and expensive ‘is not in itself a reason for refusing to order discovery which is otherwise appropriate’ ”
• stating that A[b]ecause the interrogatories themselves are relevant, the fact that answers to them will be burdensome and expensive >is not in itself a reason for refusing to order discovery which is otherwise appropriate= @
• stating that “[b]ecause the interrogatories themselves are relevant, the fact that answers to them will be burdensome and expensive ‘is not in itself a reason for refusing to order discovery which is otherwise appropriate’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).