Automatic Laundry Service, Inc. v. Telecoin Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Plaintiffs “have asked for everything conceivable and added a catch-all to include the inconceivable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.
  S.D. New York· 1973-02-22· cited 50×
• Jensen v. Boston Insurance
  N.D. California· 1957-05-10· cited 11×