Autobytel, Inc. v. Dealix Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding what a defendant knew about an infringement is relevant, demonstrates their state of mind, and a non-privileged fact
• holding scope of waiver of attorney client privilege only extended to potential infringement of the patent-in-suit, as the opinion of counsel only addressed non-infringement
• summarizing this split and collecting cases on both sides

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).