Skip to main content
· 7/22/1985

Federal Case

Citations

  • 765 F.2d 1306
  • 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 554
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20579

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that on a negligence theory, the advising / confirming / paying bank only owes a statutory duty of care to its customer, the issuing bank
  • accepting the district court's reasons for refusing to expand the confirming bank’s liability on a negligence theory
  • referring to the Farrar article

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.