Auto-Owners Insurance v. Websolv Computing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that courts “do not worry about conflict of laws unless the parties disagree on which state’s law applies” (citations omitted)
• predicting that Iowa would follow its American States interpretation holding there was no duty to defend under an identical provision
• interpreting an identical “advertising injury” provision to exclude coverage for the sending of unsolicited faxes
• federal court “applies the choice-of-law rules of the forum state to determine which state's substantive law applies”
• “Courts do not worry about conflict of laws unless the parties disagree on which state’s law applies.”
• \Courts do not worry about conflicts of laws unless the parties disagree on which state's law applies.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).