Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. City of Appleton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “commercial lobstering” falls within the purview of the Privileges and Immunities Clause
• holding that “commercial lob-stering” falls within the purview of the Privileges and Immunities Clause
• holding that “commercial lobstering” falls within the purview of the Privileges and Immunities Clause
• noting that “the right to pursue a lawful calling has long been recognized as a fundamental right” and citing Allgeyer
• explaining that States may not “treat Residents and nonresidents disparately in connection with the pursuit of commerce, a trade, or business venture where that disparate treatment is not supported by a sufficient justification”
• stating that the enforcement of a presumptively valid statute creates a heavy presumption in favor of qualified immunity and holding that the State of Connecticut was entitled to qualified immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).