· 12/12/1984
Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Bennett
Citations
- 466 So. 2d 242
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- son, who was insured for BIL under his father's policy, was also covered for UM benefits under the same policy and any exclusion to the contrary was void
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.