· 3/23/2000
Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Anderson
Citations
- 756 So. 2d 29
- 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 211
- 2000 Fla. LEXIS 629
- 2000 WL 310393
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a court “may consider established custom and usage in the insurance industry”
- noting that exclusionary clauses, if ambiguous, are construed even more strictly against the insurer than coverage clauses
- noting that “exclusionary clauses are construed even more strictly against the insurer than coverage clauses”
- reasoning that each clause in an insurance policy must be read in conjunction with the entire policy
- reasoning that each clause in an insurance policy must be read in conjunction with the entire policy
- reasoning that each clause in an insurance policy must be read in conjunction with the entire policy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pariente
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.