Skip to main content
· 3/23/2000

Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Anderson

Citations

  • 756 So. 2d 29
  • 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 211
  • 2000 Fla. LEXIS 629
  • 2000 WL 310393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a court “may consider established custom and usage in the insurance industry”
  • noting that exclusionary clauses, if ambiguous, are construed even more strictly against the insurer than coverage clauses
  • noting that “exclusionary clauses are construed even more strictly against the insurer than coverage clauses”
  • reasoning that each clause in an insurance policy must be read in conjunction with the entire policy
  • reasoning that each clause in an insurance policy must be read in conjunction with the entire policy
  • reasoning that each clause in an insurance policy must be read in conjunction with the entire policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pariente

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.