Skip to main content
· 2/20/2003

Auto Club Group Insurance v. Daniel

Citations

  • 658 N.W.2d 193
  • 254 Mich. App. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “as a matter of public policy, an insurance policy that excludes coverage for a person’s criminal acts serves to deter crime, while a policy that provides benefits to those who commit crimes would encourage it.”
  • “Generally, this Court will not invalidate contracts as adhesion contracts where the challenged provision is reasonable.”
  • ‘‘as a matter of public policy, an insurance policy that excludes coverage for a person’s criminal acts serves to deter crime, while a policy that provides benefits to those who commit crimes would encourage it’’ (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meter, Saad, Burns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.