Austin v. Walmart, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a cashier’s ques- tion of “what they were doing in Troutdale” was, along with other evidence in the record, legally sufficient evidence to put before a jury the issue of whether the cashier denied service based on race

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bock v. Vigor Works LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-24· cited 2×
• State v. Frost
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-29· cited 1×
• Tozer v. Katerra Construction LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-15· cited 1×
• Tomlinson v. Jackson County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-17· cited 1×
• Austin v. Walmart, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-07

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 85×
• Robinson v. Lamb's Wilsonville Thriftway
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-08-30· cited 66×
• Wheeler v. Marathon Printing, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-11-25· cited 24×
• King v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-12-29· cited 19×
• Lowell v. Wright
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2022-06-23· cited 16×
• Mason v. BCK Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-07-05· cited 8×
• Dalbeck v. Bi-Mart Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-13· cited 8×
• Blachana, LLC v. Oregon Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-23· cited 6×

Other cases named Austin v. Walmart, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Austin v. Walmart, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-07