Austin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e conclude 17 that, in extreme circumstances, the reinstatement of a discharged sentence, even if discharged illegally, might be fundamentally unfair, and thus violative of due process.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hawkins v. Freeman
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-11-09· cited 144×
• Hanson v. State
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1998-10-01· cited 3×
• Irving Houston Hawkins v. Franklin Freeman
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-11-09
• Jordan v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-08-27

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ventetoulo v. Attorney General RI
  First Circuit· 1993-10-06· cited 129×
• Robert Breest v. Raymond Helgemoe, Etc.
  First Circuit· 1978-06-08· cited 111×
• Quinn-L Capital Corp. v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
  Supreme Court· 1994-04-18· cited 36×
• Bossie v. State
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-02-27· cited 34×
• Gilbert v. State
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1986-02-28· cited 7×
• Austin v. State
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1962-08-06· cited 6×