Austin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing, as a matter of fundamental error, the claim that the trial court erroneously denied the defendant the assistance of counsel at his sentencing hearing but rejecting it on the merits because a full Faretta [1] hearing was conducted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Adams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-16

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Heggs v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-17· cited 853×
• Trapp v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-01· cited 249×
• Murphy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-22· cited 103×
• Latiif v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-06-07· cited 22×
• Casey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-06· cited 9×