Austin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e find the instant challenge still falls within this court's more general language in Blakley that ‘[t]o be illegal within the meaning of rule 3.800(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carter v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-05-24· cited 163×
• Blacker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-20· cited 32×
• Weford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-18· cited 16×
• Scanes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-23· cited 9×
• Al L. Burgess v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-06· cited 7×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-16· cited 6×
• Samuels v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-24· cited 3×
• Hart v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-06· cited 1×
• Bethea v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-14· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lamont v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-12-24· cited 111×
• Raley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-10· cited 61×
• Blakley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-08· cited 56×
• Bover v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-28· cited 25×
• Summers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-19· cited 16×
• Grant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-10· cited 10×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-01· cited 9×
• Marrero v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-29· cited 4×
• Corbitt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-20· cited 3×
• Sneed v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-16· cited 2×