Austin v. Indiana Family & Social Services Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that valuable services pursuant to a contract may serve as compensation, but inquiry is fact-intensive
• explaining that an administrative agency’s interpretation of a statute is entitled to great weight unless it is inconsistent with the law itself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).