Austin v. Hanchet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no plain error where, although the arrest complaint and warrant were admitted into evidence, the State’s witnesses were subject to cross-examination regarding the statements made in preparing the warrant
• holding that there was no plain error where, although the arrest complaint and warrant were admitted into evidence, the State’s witnesses were subject to cross-examination regarding the statements made in preparing the warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).