Austin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring district courts to make all permissible inferences in plaintiff’s favor on Rule 12(b)(6) motions
• “New York has affirmatively rejected the doctrine of in loco parentis at the college level.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he ‘[f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.’”
• “[T]he ‘[f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.’”
• “New York has affirmatively rejected the doctrine in loco parentis at the college level.”
• “New York has affirmatively rejected the doctrine in loco parentis at the college level.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).