· 6/14/1984
Austin v. City of Scottsdale
Citations
- 684 P.2d 151
- 140 Ariz. 579
- 46 A.L.R. 4th 941
- 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 249
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that 17 police are not “a general insurer of safety”
- dispatcher owed duty based on anonymous call regarding death threat against specific person at specific address
- sanction of dismissal “ ‘harsh and not to be invoked except under extreme circumstances’ ”
- “That children are not named plaintiffs but are merely beneficiaries does not preclude them from being ‘parties’ to the litigation.”
- “By establishing a police department, a municipality becomes neither a general insurer of safety nor absolutely liable for all harms to its citizens.”
- duty may exist when acts by police have \narrowed the obligation owed to the general public into a specific obligation owed\ to an individual
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Feldman, Gordon, Hays, Holohan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.