Skip to main content
· 6/14/1984

Austin v. City of Scottsdale

Citations

  • 684 P.2d 151
  • 140 Ariz. 579
  • 46 A.L.R. 4th 941
  • 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that 17 police are not “a general insurer of safety”
  • dispatcher owed duty based on anonymous call regarding death threat against specific person at specific address
  • sanction of dismissal “ ‘harsh and not to be invoked except under extreme circumstances’ ”
  • “That children are not named plaintiffs but are merely beneficiaries does not preclude them from being ‘parties’ to the litigation.”
  • “By establishing a police department, a municipality becomes neither a general insurer of safety nor absolutely liable for all harms to its citizens.”
  • duty may exist when acts by police have \narrowed the obligation owed to the general public into a specific obligation owed\ to an individual

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Feldman, Gordon, Hays, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.