Austin v. Bradley, Barry & Tarlow, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Massachusetts law imposes no duty unless attorneys have actual knowledge of specific third-party reliance
• refusing to infer a duty to disclose a client’s insolvency to nonclient investors where duty would directly conflict with concurrent obligation of confidentiality to client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).