Austin v. Barber
Citations
- 88 Miss. 553
- 41 So. 265
Syllabus
<p>1. Chancery Practice. Pro confesso. Decree.</p> <p>A pro confesso against a defendant authorizes only such final decree as may be properly predicated of the averments of the bill of complaint.</p> <p>2. Same. Partition. Bents.</p> <p>A final decree, based upon a pro confesso to a cross-bill, adjudging a defendant in a partition suit liable to the complainant in the cross-bill for rents is erroneous if the cross-bill contain no averment showing such liability.</p> <p>3. Same. .</p> <p>While the interest of a tenant in common who has had the use and occupation of more than his just proportion of the land may be charged with rents by a cptennant, the interest of another co-tenant who has not had such use and occupation is not so chargeable.</p>
Judges: Mayes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Walker v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court· 1904-03-15· cited 18×
- Medford v. FrazierMississippi Supreme Court· 1880-10-15· cited 7×
- George v. SolomonMississippi Supreme Court· 1893-10-15· cited 6×
- Spears v. CheathamMississippi Supreme Court· 1870-10-15· cited 4×
- Morgan v. LongMississippi Supreme Court· 1895-10-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.