Skip to main content

Austin v. Austin

Citations

  • 120 So. 3d 669
  • 2013 WL 4873486
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the same due process requirements are necessary before a party is “divested of his or her property”
  • holding while a family-owned business is considered a marital asset subject to equitable distribution, a trial court does not have the power to order the transfer of corporate property or assets without joinder of the corporation
  • “[A] trial court has the power to value and distribute corporate stock determined to be a marital asset.” (citing Mathes, 91 So.3d at 208)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowe, Swanson, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.