Skip to main content

Austin v. Austin

Citations

  • 350 So. 2d 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Long-standing statutory interpretations made by officials charged with the administration of the statutes are given great weight by the courts.
  • affirming trial court’s award of state retirement benefits to three beneficiaries designated by the deceased (a former wife and their two children) rather than to the decedent’s wife at the time of his death
  • erroneous statement that surviving spouse would receive benefits under state retirement system even if not designated as the beneficiary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCord

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.