District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/14/1977
Austin v. Austin
Citations
- 350 So. 2d 102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Long-standing statutory interpretations made by officials charged with the administration of the statutes are given great weight by the courts.
- affirming trial court’s award of state retirement benefits to three beneficiaries designated by the deceased (a former wife and their two children) rather than to the decedent’s wife at the time of his death
- erroneous statement that surviving spouse would receive benefits under state retirement system even if not designated as the beneficiary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCord
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State Dept. of Revenue v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-23· cited 95×
- Lerner v. GillSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1983-08-05· cited 72×
- Kelso & Irwin, P.A. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court· 2000-03-03· cited 56×
- Rainaldi v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-06-14· cited 40×
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-06-30· cited 40×
- Kuge v. State, Dept. of Admin., Div. of Ret.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-01· cited 27×
- Department of Revenue v. HobbsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-02-09· cited 21×
- Warren v. Department of Admin.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-14· cited 20×
- Walker v. State, Dept. of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-01-04· cited 19×
- Salz v. DEPT. OF ADMIN., DIV. OF RET.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-21· cited 17×
- Reedy Creek Imp. v. State Dept. of Envir.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-04-04· cited 15×
- Greenville County v. Kenwood Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-01-27· cited 14×
- Fraga v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-15· cited 13×
- Se Volusia Hosp. Dist. v. Nat. U. of Hosp. and Health Care Emp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-16· cited 9×
- Dolphin Outdoor Advertising v. DOTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-26· cited 9×
- First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. Dept. of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-10-18· cited 7×
- Outdoor Advertising Art, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-01-04· cited 6×
- Fraga v. DEPT. OF H & R SERV.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-12· cited 6×
- Cirnigliaro v. FLORIDA POLICE STANDARDS, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-01-14· cited 5×
- Harris v. State, Dept. of Admin.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-03· cited 5×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gay v. Canada Dry Bottling Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 1952-06-24· cited 98×
- State ex rel. Biscayne Kennel Club v. Board of Business RegulationSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-04-18· cited 72×
- Greenhut Construction Co. v. Henry A. Knott, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-04-22· cited 47×
- Hughes v. Illinois Public Aid CommissionIllinois Supreme Court· 1954-03-17· cited 47×
- Green v. HoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-05-04· cited 22×
- Brown v. RichardsonW.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-05-27· cited 18×
- Warnock v. FLORIDA HOTEL AND RESTAURANT COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-10-05· cited 18×
- Rogers v. RogersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-04-25· cited 14×
- Metropolitan Dade County v. MaddoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-12-22· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Volusia Jai-Alai, Inc. v. RingSupreme Court of Florida· 1960-06-22· cited 7×
- Steinhardt v. State, Department of Administration, Division of RetirementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-09-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.