Austin v. Austin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• good will of an ongoing, noncorporate, professional practice is not the type of property that is divisible as property in a divorce proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Finn v. Finn
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-09-06· cited 67×
• Beasley v. Beasley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-20· cited 59×
• Chiles v. Chiles
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1989-10-26· cited 57×
• Mitchell v. Mitchell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-30· cited 50×
• Allen v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1986-03-06· cited 27×
• Prahinski v. Prahinski
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-06· cited 21×
• Abrams v. Abrams
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1986-06-26· cited 20×
• Rhea v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-02-05· cited 5×
• Mitchell v. Mitchell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-10-30· cited 4×
• Joachim Strenk v. Jean Swanson Strenk
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-11-08
• Arthur M. Evans, Jr. v. Della M. Evans
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-06-21
• Mary Laverne Smith v. David Dillard Grayson
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2011-10-12
• George Earl Danner v. Kathryn M. Danner
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2020-10-29
• in the Interest of A.P.N., a Child
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2022-10-26