Skip to main content
· 12/3/2014

Austin v. American Institute for Research

Citations

  • 75 F. Supp. 3d 247
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167457
  • 2014 WL 6845551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering retaliation claim under Title VII and ADA because claim is “subtitled ‘Violation of Title VII . . .’” but “also references the ADA’s protection against retaliation”
  • taking judicial notice of an EEOC charge as it is a public document

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Richard J. Leon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.