Appellate Court of Illinois· 1/14/1964
Austin Congress Corp. v. Mannina
Citations
- 196 N.E.2d 33
- 46 Ill. App. 2d 192
- 1964 Ill. App. LEXIS 601
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the grant of a TRO was a proper exercise of discretion on the basis of allegations that the nursing home owner’s property, business, reputation, and goodwill would be substantially damaged if the picketing continued
- the grant of a TRO was a proper exercise of discretion on the basis of allegations that the nursing home owner's property, business, reputation, and goodwill would be substantially damaged if the picketing continued
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bryant, Friend, Burke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Board of Education of Community Unit School District No. 2 v. ReddingIllinois Supreme Court· 1965-05-20· cited 51×
- Huskey v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1986-04-09· cited 32×
- Centennial Laundry Co. v. West Side OrganizationIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-03-24· cited 24×
- Eagle Books, Inc. v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-01-30· cited 18×
- BARTLOW v. ShannonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-04-09· cited 18×
- Keefe v. Organization for a Better AustinAppellate Court of Illinois· 1969-09-29· cited 5×
- Gust G. Larson & Sons, Inc. v. Radio & Television Broadcast Engineers Local Union No. 1220Appellate Court of Illinois· 1965-12-28· cited 4×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 3,669×
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1942-03-09· cited 2,706×
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1940-04-22· cited 2,351×
- Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court· 1949-06-13· cited 1,230×
- Edwards v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1963-02-25· cited 931×
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court· 1949-04-04· cited 874×
- Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court· 1941-03-17· cited 496×
- American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court· 1941-03-10· cited 409×
- Hughes v. Superior Court of Cal. for Contra Costa Cty.Supreme Court· 1950-05-08· cited 350×
- Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. WohlSupreme Court· 1942-03-30· cited 320×
- Feiner v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1951-01-15· cited 318×
- Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court· 1937-05-24· cited 317×
- Carpenters & Joiners Union, Local No. 213 v. Ritter's CafeSupreme Court· 1942-04-27· cited 232×
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.Supreme Court· 1957-07-11· cited 229×
- Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302 v. AngelosSupreme Court· 1943-11-22· cited 227×
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. HankeSupreme Court· 1950-05-08· cited 201×
- Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court· 1926-10-25· cited 112×
- O'BRIEN v. MatualAppellate Court of Illinois· 1957-08-30· cited 69×
- Hotel & Restaurant Employees' International Alliance, Local No. 122 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1942-03-02· cited 66×
- Carpenters' Union v. Citizens Committee to Enforce the Landis AwardIllinois Supreme Court· 1928-12-20· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.