Austin B. v. Escondido Union School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming nonsuit on Ralph Act claim where there 7 was “no evidence that [the defendant] took the alleged actions because he was 8 biased against or had an animus against disabled children”
• upholding dismissal of Ralph Act claim where there 18 was “was no evidence that [the defendant] took the alleged actions because he was biased against 19 or had an animus against disabled children.”
• “‘Reasonable cause’ is an objective standard which asks whether any reasonable attorney would have thought the claim tenable.” (citation omitted)
• “Mere knowledge that a tort is being committed and the failure to prevent it does not constitute aiding and abetting.”
• elements of Bane Act claim are: (1) defendant interfered with or attempted to 22 interfere with plaintiff’s constitutional or statutory right by threatening or committing violent acts; 23 (2
• “A plaintiff bringing a claim pursuant to the Bane Act 8 ‘must show (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).