Auster Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Matilda Gray Stream

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district coBuarrtr eatbt uvs. eIdn dietsp . dOisrcdreert ioofn Fboyr edsteenrysing leave to amend where movant “asked for amendment promptly upon discovering the basis for new allegations”
• finding that district court abused its discretion in denying leave to amend, where movant \had diligently sought discovery in both state court and [federal court] proceedings\
• noting that amendment was not designed to achieve a tactical advantage or otherwise in bad faith
• finding that district court abused its discretion in denying leave to amend, where movant \had diligently sought discovery in both state court' and [federal court] proceedings\
• providing a full discussion of these three categories and of the continuum of the right to associate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).