Skip to main content
· 8/2/2010

Austen v. CATTERTON PARTNERS V, LP

Citations

  • 729 F. Supp. 2d 548
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77707
  • 2010 WL 3023813

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • contrasting Conn. Gen. Stat. § 33-929(f), which contains a plaintiff residency requirement, with Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-59(b), which applies to non-resident individuals, partnerships, and voluntary associations and includes no plaintiff residency requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mark R. Kravitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.