Austell Healthcare, Inc. v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when the alleged error “is shown only in the appellant’s brief and not by the record, we must assume that the trial court’s rulings were correct”(quotation marks omitted)
• when the alleged error is shown only in appellant’s brief and not by the record, appellate court must assume trial court’s rulings were correct
• when the alleged error “is shown only in the appellant’s brief and not by the record, we must assume that the trial court’s rulings were correct”
• when the alleged error “is shown only in the appellant’s brief and not by the record, we must assume that the trial court’s rulings were correct”
• “In order to constitute reversible error, both error and harm must be shown.”
• “In order to constitute reversible error, both error and harm must be shown.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).