Austad v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & Paroles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the Board maintains discretion to revoke an inmate’s suspended sentence if the inmate commits offenses that demonstrate he is unworthy of the suspension”
• stating that “[c]onditions which subject inmates to institutional rules and preclude threats of violence promote the legitimate penological objectives to deterring crimes, rehabilitating prisoners, and promoting institutional security”
• “As we established above, the Board maintains discretion to revoke an inmate's suspended sentence if the inmate commits offenses that demonstrate he is unworthy of the suspension.” (emphasis added)
• applying the “reasonably satisfied” standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).