Skip to main content

Aust v. Ohio State Dental Board

Citations

  • 737 N.E.2d 605
  • 136 Ohio App. 3d 677
  • 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 1111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the Dental Practice Act was a special statutory proceeding and the appellant was attempting to improperly bypass the special statutory proceeding through a declaratory judgment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Petree, McCormac, Tenth, Ohio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.