· 6/8/2001
Aura Communications, Inc. v. Aura Networks, Inc.
Citations
- 148 F. Supp. 2d 91
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8383
- 2001 WL 682302
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the right-leaning arch of the dominant word was the most predominant and eye-catching feature, thereby making the addition of other words as distinguishing factors irrelevant
- two marks “unquestionably similar” despite attempt to distinguish mark based on addition of word “NETWORKS” to the design
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tauro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.