Skip to main content
· 6/8/2001

Aura Communications, Inc. v. Aura Networks, Inc.

Citations

  • 148 F. Supp. 2d 91
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8383
  • 2001 WL 682302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the right-leaning arch of the dominant word was the most predominant and eye-catching feature, thereby making the addition of other words as distinguishing factors irrelevant
  • two marks “unquestionably similar” despite attempt to distinguish mark based on addition of word “NETWORKS” to the design

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.