Aumiller v. City of North Yakima
Citations
- 73 Wash. 96
- 131 P. 470
- 1913 Wash. LEXIS 2151
Syllabus
<p>■ Municipal Corporations — Improvements ■— Assessments — Benefits — Apportionment. Since property in an assessment district cannot be assessed for benefits unless benefited, under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 7707, and since the presumption is in favor of the regularity of the proceedings, the mere fact that certain property in the district was not assessed does not invalidate the assessment, in the absence of a showing that it was benefited or that the assessing officers acted arbitrarily.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- issuing writ of mandate compelling repayment of funds previously transferred in excess of State’s authority
- issuing writ of mandate compelling repayment of funds previously transferred in excess of State's authority
- mandamus is appropriate remedy where agency has clear duty to act or refrain from acting
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mount
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.