· 7/7/1955
Auman v. Fabiano
Citations
- 132 F. Supp. 353
- 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3028
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies because he “did not raise the question in his post conviction proceeding”
- finding that the petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies because he “did not raise the question in his post-conviction proceeding”
- finding that the petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies because he “did not raise the question in his post-conviction proceeding”
- finding that the petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies because he “did not raise the question in his post conviction proceeding”
- finding that the petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies because he ,“‘did not raise the question in his post conviction proceeding”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parkinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.