Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co. v. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding where it was unclear if ALJ had considered the limiting effects of Plaintiff's headaches once she found them to be a non-severe impairment
• remanding for further proceedings where the RFC for sedentary work was not supported by substantial evidence and the ALJ discredited important findings from treating providers and otherwise relied heavily on activities of daily living
• finding of harmless error is appropriate only when it is clear that the ALJ considered the claimant's relevant impairments and their effect on his ability to work during the balance of the sequential evaluation process
• “In the present case, it is not clear that the ALJ considered the limiting effects of Plaintiff’s headaches once she found them to be a non-severe impairment.”
• “At the very least, the ALJ should have given more consideration as to whether Plaintiff’s diagnosed and documented carpal tunnel syndrome resulted in more than a de minim[i]s limitation on her ability to manipulate objects and use her hands (and particularly her right hand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).