Aultman, Miller & Co. v. Leahey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allowing the stringing of coaxial cable in the easement along with other utilities was not an additional burden
• holding that allowing the stringing of coaxial cable in the easement along with other utilities was not an additional burden
• holding that allowing the stringing of coaxial cable in the easement along with other utilities was not an additional burden
• concluding that easement was exclusive and apportionable when granting instrument prohibited grantor from doing anything inconsistent with terms of easement or from constructing buildings or other structures within limits of easement
• permitting electric company to apportion its exclusive electric wire easement to cable company
• “An owner of an easement has no right to increase the burden of the easement or to materially enlarge it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).