Ault v. Blackman
Citations
- 8 Wash. 624
- 36 P. 694
- 1894 Wash. LEXIS 119
Syllabus
<p>MORTGAGES —FORECLOSURE—DEFENSES—ESTOPPEL TO DISPUTE VALIDITY OF PRIOR MORTGAGE.</p> <p>In an action to foreclose a mortgage, an answer alleging nondelivery by the mortgagor and want of consideration for the execution of the mortgage states good defenses.</p> <p>The bare recital in a mortgage that it is subject to a prior mortgage will not estop the mortgagee from questioning the consideration or validity of such prior mortgage, when the mortgagor is assailing it on the same grounds.</p>
Judges: Anders, Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.