Auletta v. Fried

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• written damage estimate prepared by insurance adjuster shortly after accident was erroneously admitted into evidence on basis that it was used to refresh recollection; accident reconstructionist's opinion based on it was consequently tainted
• “[Ujnverified out-of-court writings attempted to be introduced for the purpose of establishing the truth of matters contained in the writings constitute hearsay in exactly the same manner as out-of-court oral declarations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).