Augustus v. Harvey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Privacy Act “allows the individual to review and have a copy made of all or any portion of the records” (citing 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d))
• rejecting Plaintiff’s claim that Report of Investigation was maintained in system of records under Privacy Act, as it was not “retrieved by name, social security number or 15 any other personal identifier”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).