Augustus John Camelio v. American Federation, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the balance of competing factors ordinarily will weigh strongly in favor of declining jurisdiction over state law claims where the foundational federal claims have been dismissed at an early stage in the litigation.”
• holding that “the balance of competing factors ordinarily will weigh strongly in favor of declining jurisdiction over state law claims where the foundational federal claims have been dismissed at an early stage in the litigation.”
• holding that \the balance of competing factors ordinarily will weigh strongly in favor of declining jurisdiction over state law claims where the foundational federal claims have been dismissed at an early stage in the litigation.\
• holding that “the balance of competing factors ordinarily will weigh strongly in favor of declining jurisdiction over state law claims where the foundational federal claims have been dismissed at an early stage in the litigation.”
• noting that one factor counseling “against retention of jurisdiction” over the state-law claims is whether the claims “raise substantial questions of state law that are best resolved in state court”
• noting that whether a court should decline supplemental jurisdiction depends on a “pragmatic and case-specific evaluation of a variety of considerations,” including “the interests of fairness, judicial economy, convenience, and comity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).