· 9/17/1997
Augustea Impb Et Salvataggi, Scinicariello Augustea Ship Management Blenheim Shipping Services, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corporation
Citations
- 126 F.3d 95
- 1998 A.M.C. 364
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 24966
- 1997 WL 572531
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- similar holding with respect to a request that the parties arbitrate in a different location
- similar holding with respect to a request that the parties arbitrate in a different location
- “The forum selected by the parties in the arbitration agreement is an essential part of the parties’ agreement to arbitrate.”
- “[A] party cannot appeal a district court’s order unless, at the end of the day, the parties are forced to settle their dispute other than by arbitration.”
- “Because the district court ordered arbitration to proceed pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 4 and stayed the action on the merits, its order compelling arbitration is not appealable under 9 U.S.C. § 16(b)(2).”
- “Section 16(a)(1)(C)’s language provides that a party may appeal from a district court order denying a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 206, while under section 16(b)(2) and (3) a party cannot appeal an order compelling arbitration.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meskill, Jacobs, Leval
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.