Skip to main content
· 9/17/1997

Augustea Impb Et Salvataggi, Scinicariello Augustea Ship Management Blenheim Shipping Services, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corporation

Citations

  • 126 F.3d 95
  • 1998 A.M.C. 364
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 24966
  • 1997 WL 572531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • similar holding with respect to a request that the parties arbitrate in a different location
  • similar holding with respect to a request that the parties arbitrate in a different location
  • “The forum selected by the parties in the arbitration agreement is an essential part of the parties’ agreement to arbitrate.”
  • “[A] party cannot appeal a district court’s order unless, at the end of the day, the parties are forced to settle their dispute other than by arbitration.”
  • “Because the district court ordered arbitration to proceed pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 4 and stayed the action on the merits, its order compelling arbitration is not appealable under 9 U.S.C. § 16(b)(2).”
  • “Section 16(a)(1)(C)’s language provides that a party may appeal from a district court order denying a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 206, while under section 16(b)(2) and (3) a party cannot appeal an order compelling arbitration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Jacobs, Leval

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.