Aughe v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because that would essentially rewrite the statute, it must be seen as a fundamental alteration in the nature of the program.”
• neither Rehabilitation Act, ADA, nor Equal Protection Clause required state to waive an age limit on AFDC assistance, for benefit of student with a learning disability who remained in school, when waiver could fundamentally alter program or impose undue financial burden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).