Skip to main content
· 5/14/1913

Augerson v. Seattle Electric Co.

Citations

  • 73 Wash. 529
  • 132 P. 222
  • 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1633

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Review—Right to Allege Error — Respondents. In the absence of a cross-appeal by respondent, a decision against Mm, sustaining a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence upon one of Ms causes of- action, becomes the law of the case, and cannot be reviewed on appeal.</p> <p>Street Railroads — Negligence—Removal of Automobile from Track — Evidence—Sufficiency. The evidence is insufficient to show negligence of a street car company in removing a disabled automobile from its tracks, by pulling it out with a street car hitched to the rear springs of the automobile, where the agent of the owner in possession of the automobile suggested and consented to that method and desired it speedily removed, and there was nothing to show any safer or more practicable method of removal.</p>

Judges: Crow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.