Auerbach v. Great Western Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that the outcome of a good-faith bargaining session cannot reasonably be presumed
• “In contractual parlance, for example, doing or promising to do something one is already legally bound to do cannot constitute the consideration needed to support a binding contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-04-24· cited 380×
• Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
  California Court of Appeal· 2013-10-31· cited 231×
• Vestar Development Ii, Llc, an Arizona Limited Liability v. General Dynamics Corporation, a Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-05-10· cited 190×
• Behr v. Redmond
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-03-02· cited 146×
• Williamson v. Williamson
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-06-12· cited 54×
• Faigin v. Signature Group Holdings, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-11-06· cited 54×
• Izell v. Union Carbide Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-11-21· cited 38×
• B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Rogers
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-01-13· cited 9×
• In re Gardens Regional Hospital & Medical Center, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2017-06-21· cited 4×
• Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Co. v. United Air Lines, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-09-06· cited 3×
• Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.
  N.D. California· 2009-04-27· cited 2×
• Rossberg v. Bank of America
  California Court of Appeal· 2013-09-26
• Izell v. Union Carbide
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-10-22
• Goldilocks Corp. v. Ramkabir Motor Inn, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-01-09