Audubon Naturalist Society of the Central Atlantic States, Inc. v. United States Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that courts are to “evaluate the agency’s choices of reasonable alternatives in light of the objectives and goals of the federal action”
• discussing the then-current 2006 guidance and noting that the EPA \directed federal agencies to follow this guidance\
• “[T]he Court’s review is not of the agency’s substantive judgment, but of the sufficiency of the agency’s consideration of the reasonable alternatives.”
• “Agencies may properly eliminate from further study those alternatives that do not meet its reasonable objectives.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).