Audubon Commercial Area Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Defendants] has standing pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1) to seek a limitation and/or modification of the scope of the [non-party] subpoena.”
• “Parties have limited standing to quash subpoenas served on non-parties pursuant to Rule 45.” (citation omitted)
• “Parties have limited standing to quash subpoenas served on non-parties pursuant to Rule 45.”
• “Parties have limited standing to quash subpoenas served on non-parties pursuant to Rule 45.”
• “Parties have limited standing to quash subpoenas served on non-parties pursuant to Rule 45.”
• “Parties have limited standing to quash subpoenas served on non-parties pursuant to Rule 45.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).