Skip to main content
· 2/27/2008

Audler v. CBC Innovis Inc.

Citations

  • 519 F.3d 239
  • 2008 WL 509323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \the focus of analysis of a detrimental reliance claim is ... whether a representation was made in such a manner that the promisor should have expected the promisee to rely upon it\ (internal quotation mark omitted)
  • holding that the plaintiff could not recover on a flood insurance contract between an insurance 18 company and his lender where he “ha[d] not presented any evidence that [the bank and insurance company] intended him as a beneficiary of the contract”
  • whether the National Flood Insurance Act can support a negligence claim under Louisiana law is a question for Louisiana courts
  • “Because CAFA is based on diversity jurisdiction, state substantive law governs the determination of whether [the] petition states a claim for relief.”
  • “Because CAFA is based on diversity jurisdiction, state substantive law governs the determination of whether Audler’s petition states a claim for relief.”
  • “A party waives an issue if he fails to adequately brief it” on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Owen, Means

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.