Skip to main content
· 9/21/2007

Audler v. Astrue

Citations

  • 501 F.3d 446
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22576
  • 2007 WL 2745001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an ALJ must offer some explanation to support her conclusion but not an exhaustive list
  • explaining that an ALJ must offer some explanation to support her conclusion but not an exhaustive list
  • explaining that an ALJ must offer some explanation to support her conclusion but not an exhaustive list
  • explaining that an ALJ must offer some explanation to support his conclusion but not an exhaustive list
  • finding that the ALJ is not required “to do an exhaustive point-by-point discussion” to justify his findings
  • finding that “the ALJ clearly explained the shortcomings” in reasoning that ‘an ALJ is not always required to do an exhaustive point-by-point discussion’ of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Dennis, Prado

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.