Audit Services, Inc. v. Marselius Rolfson D/B/A Rolfson Company and Marcus Rolfson D/B/A Rolfson Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when action arises under federal 15 law, “federal common law rather than state law, was controlling with respect to 16 availability of equitable estoppel defense.”
• “The payment of cash to nonunion employees, however well- intentioned such payment may have been, does not excuse the obligation to make contributions to the funds.”
• “While the evidence showed that Marcus was sometimes careless in failing to observe the strict formalities of the corporate form, it fell far short of demonstrating any deliberate misuse of the corporate form or any fraudulent intent in forming it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).