Audain v. Gov't of the Virgin Islands

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Rule 60(b) motion was not made within a reasonable time even though it was made within one year of the judgment because it was brought on grounds which the parties were aware of throughout the entire litigation process
• observing that Sewer’s previous motion to vacate the 1994 Consent Judgment based on a variety of alleged “mistake[s] relating to his understanding of the terms of the settlement” was subject to Rule 60(b)’s one year limitation
• observing that Sewer's previous motion to vacate the 1994 Consent Judgment based on a variety of alleged \mistake[s] relating to his understanding of the terms of the settlement\ was subject to Rule 60(b)'s one year limitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).