Skip to main content
· 4/28/1998

Auction Company of America v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Manager of the Fslic Resolution Trust Fund

Citations

  • 141 F.3d 1198
  • 329 U.S. App. D.C. 414
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 1821 [d][13][D][ii] grants the FDIC immunity only from claims that can be brought through the administrative processes of § 1821 [d]
  • noting that, if the FDIC could take property without due process, serious constitutional problems would be presented
  • acknowledging that “rejection of an executory contract . . . is treated as [a] breach”
  • holding a suit against the FDIC was a suit against the United States for purposes of jurisdiction and sovereign immunity where the FDIC “did not act as receiver for any particular depository”
  • holding a suit against the FDIC was a suit against the United States for purposes of jurisdiction and sovereign immunity where the FDIC “did not act as receiver for any particular depository”
  • holding a suit against the FDIC was a suit against the United States for purposes of jurisdiction and sovereign immunity where the FDIC “did not act as receiver for any particular depository”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Wald, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.